The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to assign a court to hear the suit against the federal government's "Waters of the United States" rule. From the Pacific Legal Foundation:
As we noted here, our challenge to the government’s expansive and controversial rule redefining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) raises two important questions: (1) is the rule valid and (2) which is the proper venue for challenging such a rule–the federal district courts or the federal courts of appeals. The first question is being litigated in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. The second question will now be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.The nation's largest beef industry group is pleased that the Supreme Court is intervening. From a news release:
Today the Supreme Court granted our request to hear the case. It will be heard in April and decided by June of this year. The fact that the court has taken the case bodes well for our position that the Clean Water Act authorizes jurisdictional challenges in the federal district (trial) courts and need not be brought only in a court of appeals. The issue is important because it is unclear where and when regulated landowners can go to challenge federal rules interpreting the Clean Water Act. Filing a claim in the wrong court can result in losing the right to challenge the rule at all. The position we advocate maximizes the opportunity for the regulated public to challenge rules that define the scope of the Act.
Our brief urging the court to take the case can be read here. We will be filing another brief, on the merits of the case, in a couple of months.
Scott Yager, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association environmental counsel, today released the following statement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to grant the cert petition for the industry coalition lawsuit challenging the Environmental Protection Agency on its “waters of the United States” rule:The Capital Press' Carol Ryan Dumas is gathering input on what's next. Check our website soon.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to hear our appeal is a victory for America’s cattle producers and all private property owners across the country. It shows that the Court has a continued interest in private property rights and we look forward to oral arguments this spring.”